Take back the keys!

drewboi wrote:roger clarks beast scooby.
check out the first 8 pages or so
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthr ... ?t=1023928

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUMj0xRRTEU

6spdscreaminchickin wrote: oh yeah and full coverage so i can fuck around in it and not worry.

g3ar5hift3r wrote:well... unless u pay cash for it on the spot

anything the bank still "owns" u are required to keep full coverage on it (dumbed down version for u: till its paid off)

g3ar5hift3r wrote:paid cash for mine! Its still a 6cyl mustang to the insurance company too! $39/mo ftw.

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:deffinitly the new corvette zr1 with a TT swap(fuck superchargers) and all built up for more performance and traction. yada yada yada. all blacked out of corse. oh yeah and full coverage so i can fuck around in it and not worry.

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:first offf its rated at 625. and it doesnt even have that. oh yeah and turbochargers>superchargers. please dont make me list all the reasons why. but i changed my mind anyway fuck the zr1 i want that ligenfelter twin turbo vette. 725hp baby. and i can upgrade from their.

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:first offf its rated at 625. and it doesnt even have that. oh yeah and IN MY OPINION turbochargers>superchargers. please dont make me list all the reasons why. but i changed my mind anyway fuck the zr1 i want that ligenfelter twin turbo vette. 725hp baby. and i can upgrade from their.

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:come on man i said dont make me list em......fine

1. with a turbo you are at full boost longer. with a supercharger you only at full boost for the split second your at peek rpm's

2. superchargers are belt drivin. the belts can break and cause damage. you would need to replace the belt if it broke. becuase its belt drivin it will take away power and gas milage even at low rpms (just driving around). where a turbo wouldnt.

3. most of the time you get more horsepwoer per pound of boost out of a turbo because its moe efficant.

4. you can build a turbo so boost comes in right when you want it to for better traction and less stress on your drivtrain. with a supercharger your boost is directly running with your rpms.

5. when you shift you boost drops with your rpms in a supercharger and a turbo will still be pretty much spooled. once its back in gear your at full boost a split second later.

their are a bunch more reasons i dont rember right now.

SVT THIS wrote:

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:come on man i said dont make me list em......fine

1. with a turbo you are at full boost longer. with a supercharger you only at full boost for the split second your at peek rpm's

2. superchargers are belt drivin. the belts can break and cause damage. you would need to replace the belt if it broke. becuase its belt drivin it will take away power and gas milage even at low rpms (just driving around). where a turbo wouldnt.

3. most of the time you get more horsepwoer per pound of boost out of a turbo because its moe efficant.

4. you can build a turbo so boost comes in right when you want it to for better traction and less stress on your drivtrain. with a supercharger your boost is directly running with your rpms.

5. when you shift you boost drops with your rpms in a supercharger and a turbo will still be pretty much spooled. once its back in gear your at full boost a split second later.

their are a bunch more reasons i dont rember right now.

Sprayed33 wrote:and I'm starting to agree with Sohchottie..

itsalaser wrote:and as for the brett thing i say he stay he gives me reasons to get on these forums

SVT THIS wrote:

itsalaser wrote:and as for the brett thing i say he stay he gives me reasons to get on these forums

well, arguing with brett is almost as exciting as going to a zoo and debating politics with cocoa the chimpanzee