Take back the keys!

by **Bhaid98** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:54 pm

http://www.hotrod.com/featuredvehicles/ ... index.html

by **Rb25Cory** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:00 pm

Looks badass, but that intercooler placement is extremely inefficient without a proper scope....

by **drewboi** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:03 pm

Rb25Cory wrote: but that intercooler placement is extremely inefficient without a proper scope....

thats what i was thinking

by **Bhaid98** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:03 pm

ya thats what it says in the article they said it was to hot to touch after drivin it for a couple mintues

"We're still skeptical about those air-to-air intercoolers mounted on top of a hot engine. During our day at Willow, the discharge sides were too hot to touch-not a good sign. But there's no doubt the motor makes some power."

by **Deviant** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:27 pm

The new headlights look out of place, otherwise I like it very much.

by **6spdscreaminchickin** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:58 pm

uhhhh...... i see a clutch petal but no shifter......i even looked for paddle shifters. is the just a plate on the floor?

by **Deviant** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:00 pm

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:uhhhh...... i see a clutch petal but no shifter......i even looked for paddle shifters. is the just a plate on the floor?

Are you fucking blind? It is a paddle shifter.

by **6spdscreaminchickin** » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:04 pm

yeah nevermind i read the artical and now i see it.

by **njrupp** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:25 am

by **Rb25Cory** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:11 am

Bhaid98 wrote:ya thats what it says in the article they said it was to hot to touch after drivin it for a couple mintues

"We're still skeptical about those air-to-air intercoolers mounted on top of a hot engine. During our day at Willow, the discharge sides were too hot to touch-not a good sign. But there's no doubt the motor makes some power."

Wow, dumbasses.... 1.3million dollar fail there. That money would buy me a veyron, something that has engineering one ever nut and bolt...

by **RSbeast** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 8:12 am

Burn it. Money never can buy taste.

by **itsalaser** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:15 pm

i love the rear end the fornt doesnt do much for me though and neither does the hood

by **RS_OWNS** » Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:52 pm

[youtube]<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2XtxiZKRXiU&hl=en&fs=1&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2XtxiZKRXiU&hl=en&fs=1&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>[/youtube]

by **g3ar5hift3r** » Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:37 pm

way dissapointing.

as for the intercoolers... wtf were they even thinking?

by **LSXhilarating** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:04 pm

This must be the first car I have ever seen use Rotex blowers/superchargers

by **obrien72** » Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:38 pm

im sure the placements of the intercoolers have some advantage i mean com on...that much money in the car and no research???

i dont think so

who knows maybe their dumbasses lol

Take back the keys!

Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Re: Obsidian 1.3 million dollar stang

Who is online