Take back the keys!

I'm going to want one of these
http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/autos_content_landing_pages/1150/2011-honda-cr-z/;_ylt=AifwZidW7ZLBblz7KRc5yccEc78F;_ylv=3

wow idk at first im like wtf is that shit and after looking at more pics i really actually like it, its diffrent i like the design

yes it looks sweet i think. its practically the same thing just way modernize and tghey uses curves instead of the straight lines of the 88-91s

1.5 liter. Prolly going to be 3200lbs

Pass


Looks cool though.

Ha, looks like a dolphin!

if it's under 2800 lbs, i'll probably buy one to play with.

.

chris i should slap the tatse bud right out of your fucking face

.

.

arent they a hybrid?

boosted_em1 wrote:arent they a hybrid?

Yeah. Did anyone see this? http://forums.thecarlounge.com/zerothread?id=4617641
Honda CEO comments at Tokyo. All green, no diesels, no sports cars.

They're turning into the next Toyota. But now Toyota is bringing back their sports cars.

when did honda ever make sports cars? s2000? i guess you could count the nsx. its not like honda used to be ferrari and now they are going green lol

honda fags swapping 170 hp motors and putting turbos on tiny engines doesnt make them sports cars lol.

s2000 definitely a sports car, and a 2300 lb crx with a decent suspension is definitely a sports car

JHills wrote:s2000 definitely a sports car, and a 2300 lb crx with a decent suspension is definitely a sports car

What he said. CRX is a slight stretch but they can hold their own quite well around a road course.

This car looks kinda cool.

the CRX is NOT a sports car. period. ever. i dont care what suspension you put on it. not to mention if you put enough suspension on anything it will handle good.

CruxSucks wrote:the CRX is NOT a sports car. period. ever. i dont care what suspension you put on it. not to mention if you put enough suspension on anything it will handle good.

^^ if you put a good suspension on a mini van does that make it a sports car?...no ....crx was never a sports car... its light and easy to work on making it a good candidate for a "tuner".. the s2000 was hondas only legit attempt at a sports car

NSX was their underpowered supercar. Old guy driving a red 90's one around today. mmhmm. sexy sexy.

Honda challenge is a racing category. civics, crx's, whatever. I consider that a sports car. Doesn't really fit in any other category. But I agree it wasn't built to be a sports car, but can easily be turned into one because of its size.

CruxSucks wrote:the CRX is NOT a sports car. period. ever. i dont care what suspension you put on it. not to mention if you put enough suspension on anything it will handle good.

the mustang wasnt intended to be a muscle car as a matter of fact im pretty sure mustangs where all the rage for woman when they first came out until carroll shelby threw in some power

itsalaser wrote:

CruxSucks wrote:the CRX is NOT a sports car. period. ever. i dont care what suspension you put on it. not to mention if you put enough suspension on anything it will handle good.

the mustang wasnt intended to be a muscle car as a matter of fact im pretty sure mustangs where all the rage for woman when they first came out until carroll shelby threw in some power

i cant hate on the mustang.... they're the only reason my car exists.

6spdscreaminchickin wrote:

itsalaser wrote:

CruxSucks wrote:the CRX is NOT a sports car. period. ever. i dont care what suspension you put on it. not to mention if you put enough suspension on anything it will handle good.

the mustang wasnt intended to be a muscle car as a matter of fact im pretty sure mustangs where all the rage for woman when they first came out until carroll shelby threw in some power

i cant hate on the mustang.... they're the only reason my car exists.

... i guess if u get off to beating stock gt's.......

njrupp wrote:... i guess if u get off to beating stock gt's.......

really? no i meant the only reason gm came out with the f-body was to compete with the mustang. noob.